In my last post I mentioned books about weblogs and how I like my information about the Web to be free. Well, I just bought Rebecca Blood's The Weblog Handbook. Its a good read so far, and is going to be helpful to me for this presentation. It'll probably be an excellent handbook for the beginning blogger, and Rebecca puts the short history of the weblog in prospective for those who have yet to blog.
I'll give a full review when I'm done with it, but so far I'd highly recommend it to new bloggers. There's plenty of good advice on both the technical and social aspects of blogging. So far I've agreed with everything Rebecca teaches, but I have to admit, trying hard not to sound snooty, that I haven't gotten to anything I didn't know yet. But Rebecca will be the first to admit that the advice will be basic knowledge to anyone who's done this for awhile.
"But the more I thought about it, the more I realized how much I've learned in three years of maintaining my own site--some of which is so obvious to experienced online denizens it doesn't seem worth explaining, but that as a newcomer I wouldn't have known to ask. Thus the weblog handbook was born."
I should comment on my surprise in finding it at my local Barnes and Nobles. They didn't have any of the other weblog books in stock.
Those of you who feel strongly that information should be free, or for those who can't afford the $14.00, Rebecca's chapter on ethics is available online.
Thanks for referencing Rebecca's handbook and link to her ethics excerpt -- excellent. I especially like her standards for bloggers, whch bear repeating here:
1. Publish as fact only that which you believe to be true.
2. If material exists online, link to it when you reference it.
3. Publically correct any misinformation
4. ... add to but do not rewrite or delete any entry
5. Disclose any conflict of interest
6. Note questionable or biased sources
I would like to see these standards adhered to by many journalists and media commentators (O'Reilly, Brit Hume and the Liberal ones too). Many otherwise or previsously trustworthy publications such as The Scientific American (http://www.sciam.com) have become progressively political and hide behind their obsolete reputations for reporting science while promoting political agendas.
Posted by: Maria Tseng on January 3, 2003 09:27 PMOops I did it again! - Brittney Spears TGP thumbnail gallery we live together welivetogether little trouble maker joey jenna big naturals in the vip latina hardcore movies solo video girl
Posted by: Pastrami Sandwich on February 11, 2004 02:01 AM